Victor Haynes Jr.
2/25/18
Eng 145
Professor Hiltbrand
LOVE AND FREEDOM
Love and freedom are defined in the Webster dictionary as “unselfish loyal and benevolent concern for the good of another” and “the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action. Or some one could read “The Royal Slave” by Aphra Behn and understand the importance of freedom. Prince Oroonoko who was tricked of his freedom by an English slave trader understand the importance of freedom. The Prince also lead a rebellion in fight of his freedom knowing that if he was discovered the punishment was death. Although if you wanted to understand the true meaning of love you could read “The Story of Ch’Uh-Hyang” an eighteenth century work of traditional Korea. Ch’Uh-Hyang gives the best example of love and loyalty to her husband. Even after being harshly whipped twenty-five times she still didn't give in to doing anything that would be considered inappropriate for a married women. What do the both of these story have in common? They both have stories that grasp the meaning of love and, freedom accompanied by both main characters gives readers clear insight into both subjects.
Oroonoko was a Prince who was hoodwinked into slavery by a man he thought he befriended. He was also a warrior who was intelligent and well spoken. The Prince spoke English and French allowing him to communicate with the author who was narrating his story. Although this was a fictional book the author was a character telling the story for the enslaved Prince. Freedom is prevalent from the beginning in this story from the time period it was written and the rationalization of enslavement of African people necessary. The Prince who was in love with a women named Imoinda who was forced to be one of the Kings wives. This did not stop the Prince because he continued to see Imoinda since he was married to her before the King had taken her. While ironically they both lose their freedom the Prince is tricked into slavery and Imoinda being given that punishment for her unloyalty to the King. “Imoinda is no more; and after that, you may spare me the rest”(Behn,216). Imoinda loses her freedom and this send the Prince into profound sadness and arranges his revenge. Not knowing he would be trapped into slavery, “ they clapping great Irons suddenly on the Prince, when he was leap’d down, in the Hold to view that part of the Vessel; and locking him fast down, secured him”(Behn,220). This part of the story expresses the freedom being lost in both quotes from the imagery they impose on readers. When the section of the Prince being abducted the author Behn refers the Prince being “betrayed to slavery” or in other word the Prince was cheated of his power, he was Prince that was stripped rein over his own people. In ordered to capture the Prince the English captain had to get him drunk which was a real cowardly move and this was just the reality at the time. The setting was based in the sixteenth century just gives off the automatic alarm that freedom was had to come by and even if you were a Royal Prince that didn't matter. Oroonoko embodied freedom by not letting anything stop him from getting what he deserved and fought for his liberty’s till the end.
Ch’Uh-Hyang symbolised love for her husband in “The Song of Ch’Un-hyang” by just being loyal and not letting someone else lead her into temptation. Ch’Uh-hyang was in love with Master Yi but when Yi’s father the magistrate resigns and moves he vows to come back. And she vowed to wait for him not knowing her allegiance would be soon tested by the new magistrate makes it to town he orders Ch’Un-hyang to be his mistress. She refuses so the magistrate throws her in jail and orders her to be beaten. In this particular sections Ch’Un-hyang shows her love for her husband to the extreme not only turning the new magistrate down but undergoing such mistreat in her alliance with Master Yi. “Two spouses are faithful, Two husbands can not be, Though my body is beaten, Though I die forever, I’ll never forget master Yi (“The Song of Ch’Un-hyang”,84). This section was amazing because she rymed the cries she yelled for her husband as she took the injustice abuse. She was publicly beaten as she publicly proclaimed her love for Master Yi and in the way they arranged this in the book was quite beautiful. All Ch’Un-Hyang needed was love and the pain from the whips were non existent showing the ultimate love and anyone could understand she would do anything for her lover.
Each of these stories symbolize both love and freedom even if I look at the Royal Prince he expresses in his story a strong theme of love also with Imoinda. The Prince didn't mind the dangers of slavery when it came to his love and in the end he fought a rebellion for both love and freedom. So as did Ch’Uh-Hyang when she fought for her freedom over the new magistrate by not allowing him to pressure her into unfaithfulness. Both characters are main characters who give off a great message if truly read and understand the fight both characters went through. Together with the imagery and grit both of these stories withhold a true essence of masterpieces especially in storytelling from introduction till climax.
Lastly, I wonder the importance of both stories right now and just to see the way they shape entertainment or even fictional book we read their structure is all over today’s format. Pioneers like Aphra Behn being the first professional writer to the new beginnings of plays mocking the classic “The Song of Ch’Un-Hyang”. This fictional writing was so popular in it’s time that it shot Behn into success allowing her to be recognized as the first. And characters like Ch’Un-Hyang to play as a classic for its people and backing it up with a true message.